Revised Poem
“Subsurface Memory”
Beneath the oak, the strata hold
the isotopes of rain, grown cold.
A seed computes the flux of flame,
yet vectors upward all the same.
I placed my hand against the clay,
and felt the fossils’ slow relay—
not words, but pulses in the stone,
a signal older than my own.
The canopy, in spectral bands,
absorbed the sea’s refracted hands.
Still lignin towers, grave and mild,
stood tensile as an unborn child.
One day the wind will shear its crown,
each cellulose bond breaking down.
But deep below, in quiet code,
another root repeats the node.
From “Between the Roots” to “Subsurface Memory”
The original poem, “Between the Roots”, was written in a lyrical, almost folkloric style. It evoked natural imagery with mystery and wonder. But I wanted to see if it could be rewritten in the voice of someone who perceives the world through science as poetry—a scientist who recognizes the molecular, geological, and ecological realities beneath the imagery, yet preserves the sense of awe.
The result is “Subsurface Memory.”
Inspirations
-
Scientific Vocabulary as Metaphor
I drew on concepts from geology, biology, and physics:-
“Isotopes of rain” (echoing isotopic analysis of precipitation in paleoclimatology).
-
“Flux of flame” (the quantifiable transfer of energy).
-
“Cellulose bond” and “lignin towers” (the molecular scaffolds of trees).
-
“Spectral bands” (absorption wavelengths in photosynthesis).
These terms are factual, but here they serve as poetic anchors—grounding mystery in science.
-
-
Carl Sagan and Rachel Carson
I took inspiration from writers who bridge science and wonder. Sagan spoke of “star stuff” with reverence; Carson infused ecology with lyricism. Their example reminded me that science does not strip away awe—it deepens it. -
Pattern of Continuity
Just like the original, this version emphasizes cycles: growth, decay, and renewal. But here, they’re expressed not just in metaphor, but in material processes—cellulose bonds breaking, roots encoding signals.
Constraints Applied
-
Scientific Accuracy without Pedantry: Every scientific reference had to be real (isotopes, cellulose, fluxes), but they couldn’t read like a lab manual. They needed to feel fluid in verse.
-
Preserve Wonder: The tone had to remain meditative, not dry. Terms were chosen because they could still evoke imagery (e.g., “spectral bands” instead of “light absorption peaks”).
-
Maintain Poetic Rhythm: I kept quatrains and rhyme pairs, but allowed technical words to reshape the music.
Creative Process
I began by identifying places in the original where I used general metaphors—“whispers,” “music,” “word.” Then I replaced each with a scientific counterpart that still implied communication and continuity: isotopes, pulses, nodes. The final stanza intentionally blurs science and mysticism, with “root repeats the node,” suggesting both neural networks and underground biology.
Why This Version is Improved
-
It Expands the Imagination: By layering science into the imagery, the poem allows readers to see nature not just as mythic, but as empirically wondrous.
-
It Honors Two Ways of Knowing: Poetry and science meet here as equals—the sensory and the measurable reinforcing one another.
-
It Modernizes the Voice: In a time when readers often straddle science and art, this poem speaks in a register that resonates with both communities.
Final Reflection
Where the first poem was the voice of a dreamer listening to the earth, this new version is the voice of a scientist who dreams through the earth’s data. One does not cancel the other; rather, they complement. Together, they demonstrate that science itself can be lyrical when filtered through the human imagination.
No comments:
Post a Comment